Institute for Logic, Language and Computation

4 February 2011 , Computational Social Choice Seminar, Daniele Porello

Speaker: Daniele Porello
Title: Aggregating Ontologies by Voting: Preliminary Results
Date: Friday 4 February 2011 (changed)
Time: 16:00
Location: Room D1.114, Science Park 904, Amsterdam


The problem of aggregating different individual ontologies into a collectively accepted one has been discussed in particular in connection with belief merging. In this talk, I will present some results on the application of methods developed for voting theory and judgment aggregation to the problem of aggregating formal ontologies.

We will discuss mainly two different scenarios: (1) individuals agree on the definitions of concepts but may disagree on factual assertions, and (2) individuals disagree also on the definitions of concepts. We will see that the plurality rule does not always provide a consistent ontology, since instances of the discursive dilemma can easily be found for description logic languages. Then we will see on which ontologies the plurality rule provides consistent outcomes and we will discuss other voting procedures (mainly distance-based procedures) for the cases in which plurality fails.

This is joint work with Ulle Endriss.

For more information, see or contact Ulle Endriss ().

The websites of the UvA make use of cookiesThis site uses cookies More informationMore info Hide this message XHide X