Logical Pluralism Meets Logical Dynamics?
Johan van Benthem

Abstract:
This position paper was invited by the "Australasian Journal 
of Logic". We compare and contrast logical pluralism viewed 
as a broad study of consequence relations with logical dynamics 
as the 'coming out' of informational processes in explicit 
dynamic logics. We prove some results and raise new technical questions concerning the 'dynamification' of given consequence relations, and conversely, the abstraction from dynamic logics
to new associated substructural consequence relations. Another
merge ahead is between dynamics and paraconsistent logics.