BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:ILLC Website X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Amsterdam X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:19700329T020000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:19701025T030000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2019/newsitem/10429/7- --13-July-2019-IVR-Workshop-Judicial-decision-maki ng-integrating-empirical-and-theoretical-perspecti ves- DTSTAMP:20181220T151051 SUMMARY:IVR Workshop "Judicial decision-making: in tegrating empirical and theoretical perspectives" DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190707 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190713 LOCATION:Luzern, Switzerland DESCRIPTION:Over last decades, the empirical resea rch on judicial decision-making has bloomed. Howev er, the influence of these developments on traditi onal, conceptual theory of judicial decision-makin g has been mostly superficial. The impact of empir ical findings on concepts such as judicial discret ion, formalism, judicial rationality, legal interp retation, or rules vs. standards debate is yet to be determined. The aim of this interdisciplinary w orkshop is to combine perspectives of psychology, sociology, economics, criminology, neuroscience an d other behavioral sciences, with the legal-theore tical approach to judicial decision-making. Confi rmed speakers: Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (Cornell), Fr ederick Schauer (Virginia). We invite all contrib utions presenting philosophically important result s of experimental and other empirical studies on j udicial decision-making, with data collected from professional (judges or other professional decisio n-makers) or lay subjects. Papers showing legal-ph ilosophical implications of existing research or t rying to integrate it with traditional theories of legal reasoning, or the doctrinal approach in var ious branches of law, are also much welcome. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
Over last decades, the empirical research on judicial decis ion-making has bloomed. However, the influence of these developments on traditional, conceptual theo ry of judicial decision-making has been mostly sup erficial. The impact of empirical findings on conc epts such as judicial discretion, formalism, judic ial rationality, legal interpretation, or rules vs . standards debate is yet to be determined. The ai m of this interdisciplinary workshop is to combine perspectives of psychology, sociology, economics, criminology, neuroscience and other behavioral sc iences, with the legal-theoretical approach to jud icial decision-making.
\n\nConfirmed speak ers: Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (Cornell), Frederick Sc hauer (Virginia).
We invite a ll contributions presenting philosophically import ant results of experimental and other empirical st udies on judicial decision-making, with data colle cted from professional (judges or other profession al decision-makers) or lay subjects. Papers showin g legal-philosophical implications of existing res earch or trying to integrate it with traditional t heories of legal reasoning, or the doctrinal appro ach in various branches of law, are also much welc ome.