BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2008/newsitem/2325/27-
 31-August-2008-Logical-Pluralism-University-of-Tar
 tu-Estonia
DTSTAMP:20080417T000000
SUMMARY:Logical Pluralism, University of Tartu, Es
 tonia
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20080827
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20080831
LOCATION:University of Tartu, Estonia
DESCRIPTION:Rudolf Carnap's Principle of Tolerance
  is an early formulation of the idea of Logical Pl
 uralism: "In Logic, there are no morals. Everyone 
 is at liberty to build his own logic, i.e. his own
  form of language as he wishes". But is the logica
 l validity of an argument just a matter of languag
 e choice? And if so, is this really a pluralism ab
 out logic, not rather a pluralism about languages?
     Contemporary Logical Pluralism also insists th
 at there is more than one correct logic. Classical
 , intuitionist, and relevent logic, as well as a n
 umber of other logics, all correctly govern our re
 asoning within a given language, but apply to diff
 erent cases. Can we make sense of genuinely differ
 ent, but equally good logical consequence relation
 s?    Registration deadline for this conference is
  July 1st, 2008. To register, please send an email
  to cohnitz at ut.ee. For more information, see ht
 tp://daniel.cohnitz.de/index.php?conference.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n      <p>\nRudolf C
 arnap's Principle of Tolerance is an early formula
 tion of the\nidea of Logical Pluralism: &quot;In L
 ogic, there are no\nmorals. Everyone is at liberty
  to build his own logic, i.e. his own\nform of lan
 guage as he wishes&quot;.  But is the logical vali
 dity of\nan argument just a matter of language cho
 ice? And if so, is this\nreally a pluralism about 
 logic, not rather a pluralism about\nlanguages?\n 
      </p>\n      <p>\nContemporary Logical Plurali
 sm also insists that there is more than\none corre
 ct logic. Classical, intuitionist, and relevent lo
 gic, as\nwell as a number of other logics, all cor
 rectly govern our reasoning\nwithin a given langua
 ge, but apply to different cases. Can we make\nsen
 se of genuinely different, but equally good logica
 l consequence\nrelations?\n      </p>\n    \n     
  <p>\n       Registration deadline for this confer
 ence is July 1st, 2008.\n       To register, pleas
 e send an email to <a class="email">cohnitz <span 
 class="at">at</span> ut.ee</a>.\n       For more i
 nformation, see \n       <a target="_blank" href="
 http://daniel.cohnitz.de/index.php?conference">htt
 p://daniel.cohnitz.de/index.php?conference</a>.\n 
      </p>\n    
URL:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2008/newsitem/2325/27-
 31-August-2008-Logical-Pluralism-University-of-Tar
 tu-Estonia
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR