BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:ILLC Website X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Amsterdam X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:19700329T020000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:19701025T030000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2014/newsitem/5905/24- October-2014-Workshop-Inconsistencies-in-Scientifi c-Reasoning-Gent-Belgium DTSTAMP:20140907T000000 SUMMARY:Workshop "Inconsistencies in Scientific Re asoning", Gent, Belgium DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20141024 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20141024 LOCATION:Gent, Belgium DESCRIPTION:"Inconsistencies in Scientific Reasoni ng" is a one day workshop organized by the Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science (CLPS) at Ghen t University (http://logica.ugent.be/centrum). The workshop aims at exploring two closely related is sues. First, the descriptive question, how frequen t and how significant inconsistencies in scientifi c reasoning are. This gives rise to the second que stion, what normative conclusions we can draw from such historical analyses. The latter issue concer ns the methodological standards of scientific inqu iry, as well as the question whether classical log ic is sufficient for the explication of scientific reasoning, or whether specific non-classical logi cs are needed to this end. For more information, see http://www.philosophy.ugent.be/isr X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n
\n"In consistencies in Scientific Reasoning" is a o ne day workshop organized by the Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science (CLPS) at Ghent Universi ty (http://logica.ugent.be/centrum). The workshop aims at exploring two closely related issues. Firs t, the descriptive question, how frequent and how significant inconsistencies in scientific reasonin g are. This gives rise to the second question, wha t normative conclusions we can draw from such hist orical analyses. The latter issue concerns the met hodological standards of scientific inquiry, as we ll as the question whether classical logic is suff icient for the explication of scientific reasoning , or whether specific non-classical logics are nee ded to this end.\n
\n \nFor m ore information, see\n http://ww w.philosophy.ugent.be/isr\n
URL:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2014/newsitem/5905/24- October-2014-Workshop-Inconsistencies-in-Scientifi c-Reasoning-Gent-Belgium END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR