BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2014/newsitem/5905/24-
 October-2014-Workshop-Inconsistencies-in-Scientifi
 c-Reasoning-Gent-Belgium
DTSTAMP:20140907T000000
SUMMARY:Workshop "Inconsistencies in Scientific Re
 asoning", Gent, Belgium
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20141024
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20141024
LOCATION:Gent, Belgium
DESCRIPTION:"Inconsistencies in Scientific Reasoni
 ng" is a one day workshop organized by the Centre 
 for Logic and Philosophy of Science (CLPS) at Ghen
 t University (http://logica.ugent.be/centrum). The
  workshop aims at exploring two closely related is
 sues. First, the descriptive question, how frequen
 t and how significant inconsistencies in scientifi
 c reasoning are. This gives rise to the second que
 stion, what normative conclusions we can draw from
  such historical analyses. The latter issue concer
 ns the methodological standards of scientific inqu
 iry, as well as the question whether classical log
 ic is sufficient for the explication of scientific
  reasoning, or whether specific non-classical logi
 cs are needed to this end.   For more information,
  see http://www.philosophy.ugent.be/isr
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n      <p>\n&quot;In
 consistencies in Scientific Reasoning&quot; is a o
 ne day workshop organized by the Centre for Logic 
 and Philosophy of Science (CLPS) at Ghent Universi
 ty (http://logica.ugent.be/centrum). The workshop 
 aims at exploring two closely related issues. Firs
 t, the descriptive question, how frequent and how 
 significant inconsistencies in scientific reasonin
 g are. This gives rise to the second question, wha
 t normative conclusions we can draw from such hist
 orical analyses. The latter issue concerns the met
 hodological standards of scientific inquiry, as we
 ll as the question whether classical logic is suff
 icient for the explication of scientific reasoning
 , or whether specific non-classical logics are nee
 ded to this end.\n      </p>\n    \n      <p>For m
 ore information, see\n        <a target="_blank" h
 ref="http://www.philosophy.ugent.be/isr">http://ww
 w.philosophy.ugent.be/isr</a>\n      </p>\n    
URL:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2014/newsitem/5905/24-
 October-2014-Workshop-Inconsistencies-in-Scientifi
 c-Reasoning-Gent-Belgium
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR