BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2014/newsitem/6054/28-
 29-November-2014-The-Semantics-Pragmatics-Distinct
 ion-and-Philosophical-Methodology-Zuerich-Switzerl
 and
DTSTAMP:20141120T000000
SUMMARY:"The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction and 
 Philosophical  Methodology", Zuerich, Switzerland
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20141128
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20141129
LOCATION:Zuerich, Switzerland
DESCRIPTION:The primary aim of the conference is t
 o examine the purpose of the semantics-pragmatics 
 distinction and the arguments referred to in order
  to defend a particular account of the distinction
 .    The conference intends to address the followi
 ng questions: What is the function of the semantic
 s-pragmatics distinction? Are the different partic
 ipants in the debate trying to account for the sam
 e distinction? On which basis, i.e. referring to w
 hat kind of arguments, can a particular account of
  the distinction between semantics and pragmatics 
 be defended?    For more information, see http://w
 ww.philosophie.uzh.ch/semprag or contact semprag a
 t philos.uzh.ch.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n      <p>\n        
 The primary aim of the conference is to examine th
 e purpose of\n        the semantics-pragmatics dis
 tinction and the arguments\n        referred to in
  order to defend a particular account of the\n    
     distinction.\n      </p>\n      <p>\n        T
 he conference intends to address the following que
 stions: What is the\n        function of the seman
 tics-pragmatics distinction? Are the different\n  
       participants in the debate trying to account
  for the same distinction?\n        On which basis
 , i.e. referring to what kind of arguments, can a\
 n        particular account of the distinction bet
 ween semantics and pragmatics\n        be defended
 ?\n      </p>\n    \n      <p>\n        For more i
 nformation, see\n        <a target="_blank" href="
 http://www.philosophie.uzh.ch/semprag">http://www.
 philosophie.uzh.ch/semprag</a>\n        or contact
  <a class="email">semprag <span class="at">at</spa
 n> philos.uzh.ch</a>.\n      </p>\n    
URL:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2014/newsitem/6054/28-
 29-November-2014-The-Semantics-Pragmatics-Distinct
 ion-and-Philosophical-Methodology-Zuerich-Switzerl
 and
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR