BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2017/newsitem/9249/9--
 -10-November-2017-Workshop-Logic-in-the-Wild-Gent-
 Belgium
DTSTAMP:20170814T145314
SUMMARY:Workshop "Logic in the Wild", Gent, Belgiu
 m
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20171109
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20171110
LOCATION:Gent, Belgium
DESCRIPTION:Nowadays we are witnessing a ‘practica
 l’, or cognitive turn in logic. The approach draws
  on enormous achievements of a legion of formal an
 d mathematical logicians, but focuses on `the Wild
 : actual human processes of reasoning and argument
 ation. Moreover, high standards of inquiry that we
  owe to formal logicians offer a new quality in re
 search on reasoning and argumentation. In terms of
  John Corcoran’s distinction between logic as form
 al ontology and logic as formal epistemology, the 
 aim of the practical turn is to make formal episte
 mology even more epistemically oriented. This is n
 ot to say that this ‘practically turned’ (or cogni
 tively oriented) logic becomes just a part of psyc
 hology. This is to say that this logic aquires a n
 ew task of “systematically keeping track of changi
 ng representations of information”, as Johan van B
 enthem puts it, and that it contests the claim tha
 t the distinction between descriptive and normativ
 e accounts of reasoning is disjoint and exhaustive
 . From a different than purely psychological persp
 ective logic becomes — again — interested in answe
 ring Dewey’s question about the Wild: how do we th
 ink? This is the new alluring face of psychologism
 , or cognitivism, in logic, as opposed to the old 
 one, which Frege and Husserl fought against. This 
 is the area of research to which this workshop is 
 devoted.  We welcome submissions on any topic that
  fits into the scope as described above.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<div>\n  <p>Nowadays 
 we are witnessing a ‘practical’, or cognitive turn
  in logic. The approach draws on enormous achievem
 ents of a legion of formal and mathematical logici
 ans, but focuses on `the Wild: actual human proces
 ses of reasoning and argumentation. Moreover, high
  standards of inquiry that we owe to formal logici
 ans offer a new quality in research on reasoning a
 nd argumentation. In terms of John Corcoran’s dist
 inction between logic as formal ontology and logic
  as formal epistemology, the aim of the practical 
 turn is to make formal epistemology even more epis
 temically oriented. This is not to say that this ‘
 practically turned’ (or cognitively oriented) logi
 c becomes just a part of psychology. This is to sa
 y that this logic aquires a new task of “systemati
 cally keeping track of changing representations of
  information”, as Johan van Benthem puts it, and t
 hat it contests the claim that the distinction bet
 ween descriptive and normative accounts of reasoni
 ng is disjoint and exhaustive. From a different th
 an purely psychological perspective logic becomes 
 — again — interested in answering Dewey’s question
  about the Wild: how do we think? This is the new 
 alluring face of psychologism, or cognitivism, in 
 logic, as opposed to the old one, which Frege and 
 Husserl fought against. This is the area of resear
 ch to which this workshop is devoted.</p>\n</div><
 div>\n  <p>We welcome submissions on any topic tha
 t fits into the scope as described above.</p>\n</d
 iv>
URL:http://www.lrr.ugent.be/logic-in-the-wild/
CONTACT:lrr at ugent.be
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
