BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2021/newsitem/12632/30
 -April-2021-PhD-Defense-Cian-Guilfoyle-Chartier
DTSTAMP:20210401T162854
SUMMARY:PhD Defense, Cian Guilfoyle Chartier
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20210430T100000
LOCATION:Online
ATTENDEE;ROLE=Promotor:Frank Veltman
ATTENDEE;ROLE=Copromotor:Sonja Smets
DESCRIPTION:The thesis characterises logic as a fo
 rmal presentation of a guide to undertaking a rati
 onal practice, a guide which is itself constituted
  by epistemic norms and their consequences. There 
 in general may be more than one "good" presentatio
 n, more than one "good" practice, and more than on
 e way to conceive of the practice. This is a pragm
 atic conception of logical pluralism we call thoro
 ughgoing logical pluralism. The thesis consists in
  a defence of thoroughgoing logical pluralism, and
  a case for how such a characterisation of logic i
 s helpful in addressing problems in logical revisi
 on, semantic paradoxes, and the incommensurability
  of logical theories.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n  <p>The thesis cha
 racterises logic as a formal presentation of a gui
 de to undertaking a rational practice, a guide whi
 ch is itself constituted by epistemic norms and th
 eir consequences. There in general may be more tha
 n one &quot;good&quot; presentation, more than one
  &quot;good&quot; practice, and more than one way 
 to conceive of the practice. This is a pragmatic c
 onception of logical pluralism we call thoroughgoi
 ng logical pluralism. The thesis consists in a def
 ence of thoroughgoing logical pluralism, and a cas
 e for how such a characterisation of logic is help
 ful in addressing problems in logical revision, se
 mantic paradoxes, and the incommensurability of lo
 gical theories.</p>\n
URL:https://www.illc.uva.nl/Research/Publications/
 Dissertations/DS/#DS-2021-05
CONTACT:Cian Guilfoyle Chartier at chartiec at tcd
 .ie
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR