BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2019/newsitem/10438/21
 -February-2019-Spinoza-Lectures-Catherine-Malabou
DTSTAMP:20181220T152409
SUMMARY:Spinoza Lectures, Catherine Malabou
ATTENDEE;ROLE=Speaker:Catherine Malabou
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20190221T201500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20190221T220000
LOCATION:Aula, Oude Lutherse kerk, Singel 411, Ams
 terdam
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:  In contemporary Western phi
 losophy, destruction or deconstruction of metaphys
 ics has been presented by prominent thinkers like 
 Levinas, Derrida or Schürmann as the liberation of
  an an-archic way of thinking. The possibility of 
 questioning and acting beyond the «arkhè», beyond 
 the principle (commandment and beginning at the sa
 me time), has opened new perspectives in ontology 
 and ethics. Levinas, for example, characterizes th
 e relation to the Other in terms of «an-archic res
 ponsibility». Interestingly, such an ontological a
 nd ethical anarchy has always been strictly distin
 guished from political anarchism. Can we envisage 
 a confrontation between the two traditions? Is "po
 st anarchism" a satisfactory way of setting it up?
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n  <p>Abstract:<br>\
 n  In contemporary Western philosophy, destruction
  or deconstruction of metaphysics has been present
 ed by prominent thinkers like Levinas, Derrida or 
 Schürmann as the liberation of an an-archic way of
  thinking. The possibility of questioning and acti
 ng beyond the «arkhè», beyond the principle (comma
 ndment and beginning at the same time), has opened
  new perspectives in ontology and ethics. Levinas,
  for example, characterizes the relation to the Ot
 her in terms of «an-archic responsibility». Intere
 stingly, such an ontological and ethical anarchy h
 as always been strictly distinguished from politic
 al anarchism. Can we envisage a confrontation betw
 een the two traditions? Is &quot;post anarchism&qu
 ot; a satisfactory way of setting it up?</p>\n
URL:http://www.uva.nl/disciplines/shared/faculteit
 en/en/faculteit-der-geesteswetenschappen/events/le
 ctures/2019/02/spinoza-lecture-beyond-the-archic-p
 rinciple.html
CONTACT:secr.wijs-fgw at uva.nl
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR