BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:ILLC Website
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:/NewsandEvents/Archives/2022/newsitem/13526/19
 -April-2022-EXPRESS-PhilMath-Seminar-Gil-Sagi
DTSTAMP:20220414T145041
SUMMARY:EXPRESS / PhilMath Seminar, Gil Sagi
ATTENDEE;ROLE=Speaker:Gil Sagi
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20220419T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20220419T180000
LOCATION:Online via Zoom
DESCRIPTION:Is there a relation of logical consequ
 ence in natural language? Logicality, in the philo
 sophical literature, has been conceived of as a re
 strictive phenomenon that is alien to the complex 
 and messy character of natural language. In this t
 alk, I will claim that there is a relation of logi
 cal consequence in natural language, and moreover,
  that it is the subject matter of the bulk of curr
 ent theories of formal semantics. I employ the fra
 mework of semantic constraints (Sagi 2014), which 
 generalises the Tarskian definition of logical con
 sequence. I apply the widely accepted criterion of
  invariance under isomorphisms (Sher 1996) general
 ised to the framework of semantic constraints (Sag
 i 2022), as well as a theory of Glanzberg (2014) t
 o delineate the relation of logical consequence in
  natural language.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n  <p>Is there a rel
 ation of logical consequence in natural language? 
 Logicality, in the philosophical literature, has b
 een conceived of as a restrictive phenomenon that 
 is alien to the complex and messy character of nat
 ural language. In this talk, I will claim that the
 re is a relation of logical consequence in natural
  language, and moreover, that it is the subject ma
 tter of the bulk of current theories of formal sem
 antics. I employ the framework of <em>semantic con
 straints</em> (Sagi 2014), which generalises the T
 arskian definition of logical consequence. I apply
  the widely accepted criterion of invariance under
  isomorphisms (Sher 1996) generalised to the frame
 work of semantic constraints (Sagi 2022), as well 
 as a theory of Glanzberg (2014) to delineate the r
 elation of logical consequence in natural language
 .</p>\n
URL:https://inferentialexpressivism.com/seminar/
CONTACT:Lwenn Bussière-Caraes at bussiere at sequi
 tur.eu
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR