Coherence and Complexity in Fragments of Dependence Logic Jarmo Kontinen Abstract: We study the properties of fragments of dependence logic (D) over finite structures. One essential notion used to distinguish between D-formulas is so-called k-coherence of a formula. Satisfaction of a k-coherent formula in all teams can be reduced to the satisfaction in the k-element sub-teams. We will characterize the coherence of quantifier-free D-formulas and give an example of a formula which is not k-coherent for any natural number. We show that all coherent formulas are equivalent to first-order sentences when there is an extra predicate interpreting the team. We also seek to characterize the computational complexity of model checking of D-formulas. A classic example in the field of descriptive complexity theory is the Fagin's theorem, which establishes a perfect match between existential second order (ESO) formulas and languages in NP. D-formulas are known to have a definition in ESO and vice versa. When we combine this with Fagin's result we get that the properties definable in D over finite structures are exactly the ones recognized in NP. We use the notion of coherence to give a characterization for the computational complexity of the model checking for D-formulas. We establish three thresholds in the computational complexity of the model checking, namely when the model checking can be done in logarithmic space (L), in non-deterministic logarithmic space (NL) and when the checking becomes complete for non-deterministic polynomial time (NP). We give complete instances for NL and NP. Another criterion we use to find structure inside dependence logic is asymptotic probability and the 0-1-law. We show that the 0-1-law holds for universal and existential D-sentences as well as for all the quantifier-free formulas in the case of atomic probability 1/2. In the second part of the thesis we give a characterization for the 0-1-law for proportional quantifiers over uniform distribution of finite graphs. We will give a precise threshold when the 0-1- law holds for finite variable infinitary logic extended with a proportional quantifier and when it does not.