Logics and Provability Katsumi Sasaki Abstract: Logics and provability Katsumi Sasaki In this thesis, we treat three kinds of propositional logics. The first kind connects with a non-modal propositional logic, called formal propositional logic (FPL), another is an intuitionistic modal logic, and the third kind consists of interpretability logics. These logics are related to or connected with the provability logic GL, the normal modal logic obtained from the smallest normal modal logic K by adding Lob's axiom $\Box (\Box p \supset p) \supset \Box p$. The name ``provability logic'' derives from Solovay's completeness theorem. He proved that GL is complete for the formal provability interpretation in Peano arithmetic PA. So, GL has been considered as one of the most important modal logics. FPL as well as interpretability logics also have a formal provability interpretation. FPL is the propositional logic embedded into GL by Godel's translation $\tau$. Interpretability logics are modal logics with a binary modal operator $\rhd$ including GL. We treat these two kinds of logics with this motivation in mind. The normal modal logic K4 is a sublogic of GL, which is obtained from K by adding the transitivity axiom $\Box p \supset \Box \Box p$. As is expected by the additional axioms of K4 and GL, the transitivity axiom and Lob's axiom, K4 is much easier to deal with than GL. So, as was stated by C. Smorynski, knowledge of K4 is useful for the discussion of GL. Here we also treat Visser's propositional logic (VPL), the propositional logic embedded into K4 by $\tau$, before treating FPL, and the sublogic of the smallest interpretability logic IL whose $\rhd$-free fragment is K4, before IL. We consider the consequence relation of VPL and a property of Lob's axiom on VPL. To give cut-free sequent systems is one of the issues here. We first give such systems for VPL and the sublogic of IL, and then, using a property of Lob's axiom, for FPL and IL. The remaining one among the logics treated here is the intuitionistic modal logic called propositional lax logic (PLL) by M. Fairtlough and M. Mendler. PLL is not a logic for provability. However, PLL has other interesting interpretations. For example, it corresponds to the computational typed lambda calculus introduced by E. Moggi by the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Here we discuss Diego's theorem in PLL, and elucidate the structure of sets of disjunction free formulas with only finitely many propositional variables.