Some extensions of the basic framework

The papers below propose some extensions of the basic inquisitive semantics framework.

Ivano Ciardelli, Floris Roelofsen, and Nadine Theiler. Linguistics and Philosophy 40(1), 1-36, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10988-016-9195-2.

Ivano Ciardelli and Floris Roelofsen. Synthese 192(6), pp. 1643-1687, 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0404-7 (springerlink).

Information, issues, and attention
Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk and Floris Roelofsen. In Daniel Gutzmann, Jan Köpping, and Cécile Meier, editors, Appoaches to Meaning: Composition, Values, and Interpretation, pages 128-166, Brill, 2014.

Vít Puncochár. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, published online first May 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s10849-015-9219-2.

Vit Puncochár. Journal of Philosophical Logic, published online first July 2015, DOI:10.1007/s10992-015-9379-1.

Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions
Floris Roelofsen and Donka Farkas. Language, 91(2), 359-414, 2015. (publisher site)

Toward a suppositional inquisitive semantics
Jeroen Groenendijk and Floris Roelofsen, To appear in Martin Aher, Daniel Hole, Emil Jerabek, and Clemens Kupke, editors, Logic, Language, and Computation: revised selected papers from the 10th International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation, Springer, 2014.

Towards a logic of information exchange: an inquisitive witness semantics.
Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen. In Bezhanishvili et.al., editors, Logic, Language, and Computation: revised selected papers from the 9th International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation, pages 51-72, Springer, Berlin 2013.